For small size prints, LR goes a long way, although it's hard to beat final output that got a bit more care and handholding. Large output sizes in particular can benefit from that. So one could Export and resize the already Capture sharpened Master TIFF to output size printer resolution) from LR without LR sharpening, which would create a new TIFF, then output sharpen that in Photoshop for that specific output size and its viewing conditions. PK sharpener, FocusMagic, or Topaz Detail) is that you have much more control at the final output size than Lightroom offers. The benefit of output sharpening in Photoshop (e.g.
FOCUS MAGIC VERSUS PHOTOSHOP PRO
Its resampling is better than from Photoshop, unless you use dedicated resampling plugins in PS, such as PhotoZoom Pro (only for upsampling) or Perfect Resize. If you can settle for LRs output sharpening, then that will give decent results.
I usually start my Photoshop processing (running just one action to do all the work) with the creation of a duplicate of Background layer, and put it in Luminosity blending mode, with initial Blend-if layer settings, like shown below, and Capture sharpen that layer. However, it can create artifacts, so you won’t get very natural-looking results.
FOCUS MAGIC VERSUS PHOTOSHOP SOFTWARE
It is a widely known sharpening software that can deal with camera shake and focus blur. There can be scenarios where it is possible to do good Capture sharpening as a final step, but then it is more commonly combined with other things like resampling, distortion corrections, or plain resizing. Focus Magic uses advanced forensic strength deconvolution technology to remove blur. Once you start introducing all sorts of tonal adjustments, the original capture relationships between tones gets lost, which can be good for viewing, but troublesome for deconvolution sharpening (either shadows or highlights may develop halos at edge transitions). Strictly, it also works best on linear gamma data, but the algorithm could do an intermediate gamma linearization round trip under-the-hood (FocusMagic seems to to things right, including reducing the risk of amplifying noise too much). This allows the deconvolution to consider the tonal differences as they were shot (and blurred by the capture process). In principle, one would start with Capture sharpening (if necessary preceded by noise reduction if there is a lot of it).